In many hill princely states, a “subsidiary alliance” type arrangement mainly ensured the ruler accepted A Foreign policy control B
Continue readingCategory: 1. Common Subject
Chapter 9: British Period and Freedom Struggle (Set-3)
In hill princely states, British “paramountcy” usually allowed the ruler freedom mainly in A External diplomacy matters B Internal daily
Continue readingChapter 9: British Period and Freedom Struggle (Set-2)
In a princely hill state under British “paramountcy,” the ruler usually could not freely control A Local festivals rules B
Continue readingChapter 9: British Period and Freedom Struggle (Set-1)
In many hill states, British control usually worked through rulers by which system A Direct annexation rule B Indirect rule
Continue readingChapter 8: Medieval Hill States and External Influences (Set-5)
A medieval record says the Kangra ruler “submitted but retained his kingdom”; which relationship does this best show A Full
Continue readingChapter 8: Medieval Hill States and External Influences (Set-4)
A hill chief accepts tribute but keeps local courts and officers; this arrangement is best described as A Direct imperial
Continue readingChapter 8: Medieval Hill States and External Influences (Set-3)
For hill rulers facing repeated Sultanate pressure, which choice best helped keep internal rule while avoiding direct occupation A Total
Continue readingChapter 8: Medieval Hill States and External Influences (Set-2)
In hill regions, which natural feature most reduced the speed of large invading armies and their supplies A Open grass
Continue readingChapter 8: Medieval Hill States and External Influences (Set-1)
In medieval hill politics, why were strong forts especially important against large plain-based armies A Flat land advantage B Faster
Continue readingChapter 7: Ancient and Early Medieval Period (Set-5)
In a hill tract, if imperial influence is seen mainly in ethics and symbols but not in routine governance, the
Continue reading